JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 8, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Myriam Avila Roldán

✓Claimant Wiston Alonso Mosquera Mosquera

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica formulado contra el auto proferido por el Magistrado Alberto Rojas Ríos para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, al concluir que sobre el problema jurídico planteado existía cosa juzgada constitucional.

Tras compartir las razones que dieron lugar al rechazo de la demanda, la Sala Plena decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 2 de junio de 2015, proferido por el magistrado Alberto Rojas Ríos, que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, formulada por el ciudadano Wiston Alonso Mosquera Mosquera.
  2. SEGUNDO. A través de la Secretaría General de la Corte, comuníquese el contenido de esta decisión al recurrente, indicándole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno. Para ello, deberá utilizarse el medio más expedito y eficaz, habida cuenta sus condiciones de reclusión en establecimiento carcelario.
  3. TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decisión, archívese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.